Resolutions of fat points ideals involving eight general point of \(\mathbb{P}^2\) (Q5952415)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1688908
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Resolutions of fat points ideals involving eight general point of \(\mathbb{P}^2\)
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1688908

      Statements

      Resolutions of fat points ideals involving eight general point of \(\mathbb{P}^2\) (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      29 March 2004
      0 references
      fat points
      0 references
      Hilbert function
      0 references
      graded free resolution
      0 references
      rational surface
      0 references
      graded Betti numbers
      0 references
      divisor class group
      0 references
      algorithm
      0 references
      Let \(P_1,\dots, P_8\in\mathbb{P}^2\) be eight general points and \(Z= m_1P_1+\cdots+ m_8 P_8\) a scheme of fat points, i.e. the scheme defined by \(I_Z= (I_{P_1})^{m_1}\cap\cdots\cap (I_{P_8})^{m_8}\). By a result by \textit{M. Nagata} [Mem. Coll. Sci., Univ. Kyoto, Ser. A 33, 271--293 (1960; Zbl 0100.16801)], the Hilbert function of \(Z\) is known. In this paper, the authors describe an algorithm for computing the graded Betti numbers of \(Z\).NEWLINENEWLINE Instead of working with \(I_Z\), they translate the problem into questions about divisors on the rational surface \(X\) obtained by blowing up \(\mathbb{P}^2\) in \(\{P_1,\dots, P_8\}\). Thus the main theorem provides several formulae for the dimensions of the kernels and the cokernels of the multiplication by linear forms on the vector spaces of global sections of monotone divisors on a ``good'' surface. The proof of this theorem relies on a careful study of the geometry and the structure of the divisor class group of such a surface.NEWLINENEWLINE The paper is written in a concise and clear manner. Unfortunately, the method employed by the authors does not appear to admit an easy extension to the case of \(\geq 9\) points in \(\mathbb{P}^2\), since the rational surfaces obtained by blowing up those points are not del Pezzo surfaces anymore.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references