Equivalence of two definitions of a double regular integral on the plane (Q5960257)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1727660
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Equivalence of two definitions of a double regular integral on the plane |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1727660 |
Statements
Equivalence of two definitions of a double regular integral on the plane (English)
0 references
14 April 2002
0 references
In the paper the equivalence of two types of definitions of the double regular integral on the plane is discussed, namely, the Henstock definition in which the generalized Riemann sums are used and the descriptive definition in terms of primitives. The author presents a direct proof of the equivalence of the constructive and descriptive double regular integral in \(\mathbb{R}^2\). In [\textit{R.~A.~Gordon}, Real. Anal. Exch. 16, No.~1, 154-168 (1991; Zbl 0723.26005)] similar problems are considered for the one-dimensional case.
0 references
double regular integral on \(\mathbb{R}^2\)
0 references
equivalence of definitions
0 references
Henstock definition
0 references
descriptive definition
0 references
0.7449550628662109
0 references
0.7398494482040405
0 references
0.7330493330955505
0 references
0.7315049767494202
0 references
