Comparison on five estimation approaches of intensity for a queueing system with short run (Q638038)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5946105
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Comparison on five estimation approaches of intensity for a queueing system with short run
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5946105

      Statements

      Comparison on five estimation approaches of intensity for a queueing system with short run (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      8 September 2011
      0 references
      Confidence intervals construction is considered for \(\rho= E Y/E X\) by i.i.d. samples \(X_1\),\dots, \(X_n\) and \(Y_1\),\dots, \(Y_m\). The authors discuss the asymptotic plug-in interval based on CLT and four bootstrap-type procedures: standard, Bayesian, percentile and accelerated bias corrected bootstrap confidence intervals. Performance of the algorithms is assessed via simulations. Special attention is paid to the case when \(X\) and \(Y\) represent the interarrival and service times of a queueing system (and \(\rho\) is the utilization factor or the intensity of the system). The authors' conclusion is that the Bayesian bootstrap outperforms the other four approaches in terms of relative coverage.
      0 references
      confidence interval
      0 references
      accelerated bias corrected bootstrap
      0 references
      Bayesian bootstrap
      0 references
      utilization factor
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references