Why the theorem of Scheffé should be rather called a theorem of Riesz (Q653814)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5990592
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Why the theorem of Scheffé should be rather called a theorem of Riesz |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5990592 |
Statements
Why the theorem of Scheffé should be rather called a theorem of Riesz (English)
0 references
19 December 2011
0 references
The author presents Riesz's Lemma (\(f_n(x)\rightarrow f(x)\) a.e.\ and \(\lim_n| | f_n| | _p=| | f| | _p\) imply \(\lim_n| | f_n-f| | _p=| | f| | _p\)) and Riesz's original elegant proof. In particular it is pointed out that \textit{H. Scheffe}'s Theorem of 1947 [Ann. Math. Stat. 18, 434--438 (1947; Zbl 0032.29002)] (stating that the distributions of a sequence \((f_n)\) of densities, which converges a.e.\ to a density \(f\), converges uniformly to the distribution of \(f\)) is actually a special case of Riesz's lemma of 1928.
0 references
Scheffé theorem
0 references
convergence in total variation
0 references
characterization of \(L_p\)-convergence
0 references
0.8013409376144409
0 references
0.7638172507286072
0 references
0.7489811182022095
0 references
0.7467445731163025
0 references