Readers of the first edition of Newton's \textit{Principia} on the relation between gravity, matter, and divine and natural causation: British public debates, 1687--1713 (Q6604582)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Readers of the first edition of Newton's \textit{Principia} on the relation between gravity, matter, and divine and natural causation: British public debates, 1687--1713 |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7912894
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Readers of the first edition of Newton's \textit{Principia} on the relation between gravity, matter, and divine and natural causation: British public debates, 1687--1713 |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7912894 |
Statements
Readers of the first edition of Newton's \textit{Principia} on the relation between gravity, matter, and divine and natural causation: British public debates, 1687--1713 (English)
0 references
12 September 2024
0 references
This article examines how Newton's \textit{Principia} was invoked, to various purposes, in theological discussions of late-17th- and early-18th-century Britain. Some of the participants in these debates were active in both the mathematical/scientific and the clerical spheres. For example, William Whiston was chaplain to the bishop of Norwich and, later, Newton's immediate successor to the Lucasian chair of mathematics at Cambridge. Likewise, Samuel Clarke replaced Whiston as chaplain and also was commissioned by Newton to translate the latter's \textit{Opticks} into Latin. The present article surveys how Whiston, Clarke, and other contemporaries used Newton's work to bolster their own respective theological and philosophical stances, noting that the \textit{Principia}'s treatment of the existence of a vacuum received particular attention from many of these people.
0 references
\textit{Principia}
0 references
gravity and matter
0 references
divine and natural causation
0 references