A dynamic multi-item two-activity problem (Q684385)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A dynamic multi-item two-activity problem |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 411679
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | A dynamic multi-item two-activity problem |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 411679 |
Statements
A dynamic multi-item two-activity problem (English)
0 references
15 September 1993
0 references
A special class of dynamic programming problems is considered. There are two activities labelled \(\{1,2\}\) exactly one unit of one of these is to be performed in each period. \(i\), \(j\) denotes the total number of times they have to be performed respectively. They yield random rewards \((y_ n,z_ n)\) [possibly negative] which are known before the decision made at time \(n\) and whose joint probability distribution is i.i.d. and have finite means. There may be fixed costs \(c\) (for both activities), \(c_ i\) (for activity \(i\)) per period. The problem involves maximization of the expected total discounted rewards and the paper seeks to provide simple decision rules. Denote by \(g_{ij}\) the maximal value and define \(d_{ij}\equiv\beta(g_{ij-1}-g_{i-1,j})\), where \(\beta\) is the discount factor. \(d_{ij}\) is a measure of preference for activity 1 over 2 when one additional activity is added to the pair \((i-1,j-1)\). Let \(y\), \(z\) stand for the random rewards and \(u\equiv y-z\). An optimal decision rule depends on \(y\), \(z\) only via \(u\). Writing this as \(f(i,j,u)\) it satisfies \(f(\cdot)= 1\) if \(u\geq d_{ij}\) and \(f(\cdot)=2\) if \(u< d_{ij}\) [Lemma 1]. Theorem 1 provides recursive formulae based on parameter values (including the distribution function) for calculating \(g_{ij}\), \(d_{ij}\). Various monotonicity properties are established for the decision rule in special cases. In particular, Theorem 5 shows that \(f(\cdot)\) is decreasing in \(u\), increasing in \(j\) if \(c\leq c_ 1\) and decreasing in \(i\) if \(c\leq c_ 2\). In special cases \(d_{ij}\) have limiting values (with respect to variations, in \(i\), \(j\)) and there may exist a number \(i^*(u)\) [similarly for \(j\)] s.t. for \(i\geq i^*(u)\), \(f(\cdot)=1\) regardless of \(j\) [Theorem 6]. Results regarding bounds for the different limiting values under various scenarios regarding the discount factor is presented. Relation to other papers in the literature and economic examples of sales of assets, harvesting etc. are discussed.
0 references
sequential asset selling
0 references
expected total discounted rewards
0 references
sales of assets
0 references
harvesting
0 references
0.7759286165237427
0 references
0.7726282477378845
0 references
0.7378517389297485
0 references
0.7311264276504517
0 references