Topological aspects of non-convergent sequences -- a comment on Burgin's concept of fuzzy limits (Q705508)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2131579
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Topological aspects of non-convergent sequences -- a comment on Burgin's concept of fuzzy limits |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2131579 |
Statements
Topological aspects of non-convergent sequences -- a comment on Burgin's concept of fuzzy limits (English)
0 references
31 January 2005
0 references
The paper starts with some polemic against M. Burgin (see, e.g., [\textit{M. Burgin}, ``Theory of fuzzy limits'', Fuzzy Sets Syst. 115, No. 3, 433--443 (2000; Zbl 0960.26009)]) and his prophetic sentences like: ``\dots theory of fuzzy limits is the base of the neoclassic analysis, which is a new branch of fuzzy mathematics and extends possibilities provided by classical analysis.'' Höhle asks: ``Does the renaming of bounded sequences into fuzzy convergent sequences mean the extension of possibilities provided by classical analysis?'' and feels sorry for ``the complete avoidance of any topological argument''. Using topologies on [0,1]-valued sets, the author shows that every bounded sequence has always local limit points represented by singletons of the underlying [0,1]-valued set.
0 references
topology on a [0
0 references
1]-valued set
0 references
limit maps
0 references
limit points
0 references
fuzzy limits
0 references
0.8010915517807007
0 references
0.7953171730041504
0 references
0.7821013927459717
0 references
