First order tameness of measures (Q714724)
From MaRDI portal
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes.
Please use this page instead for the normal view: First order tameness of measures
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6092971
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | First order tameness of measures |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6092971 |
Statements
First order tameness of measures (English)
0 references
11 October 2012
0 references
This paper develops a framework for measure theory and integration in the setting of an o-minimal expansion of the real field, \(M\) say. The author takes as a starting point a result due to \textit{G. Comte} et al. [Ill. J. Math. 44, No. 4, 884--888 (2000; Zbl 0982.32009)], but this is viewed a property of the measure. So a measure \(\mu\) is said to be \(M\)-\textit{tame} if this result holds for \(M\)-definable functions when \(\mu\) is taken in place of Lebesgue measure. More precisely, a Borel measure \(\mu\) on \(\mathbb R^n\) is \(M\)-tame if there is an o-minimal expansion \(M'\) of \(M\) such that for any \(M\)-definable family of functions on \(\mathbb R^n\) the family obtained by integrating with respect to \(\mu\) is definable in \(M'\). With this definition, the result of Comte et al. [loc. cit.] says that for positive integers \(n\) the Lebesgue measure on \(\mathbb R^n\) is \(\mathbb R_{\text{an}}\)-tame. The paper gives further examples of tame measures and various variations on the definition, and then goes on to prove versions of classical theorems, such as the Radon-Nikodym theorem.
0 references
o-minimal structure
0 references
compatible measure
0 references
tame measure
0 references
0 references
0 references
0.7284182
0 references
0.6933321
0 references
0.69094676
0 references
0.67146486
0 references
0.67026347
0 references
0.6623353
0 references