The Prime Number Theorem (Q7361295)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

AFP entry Prime_Number_Theorem
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    The Prime Number Theorem
    AFP entry Prime_Number_Theorem

      Statements

      19 September 2018
      0 references
      Manuel Eberl
      0 references
      Lawrence C. Paulson
      0 references
      The Prime Number Theorem (English)
      0 references
      This article provides a short proof of the Prime Number Theorem in several equivalent forms, most notably π( x ) ~ x /ln x where π( x ) is the number of primes no larger than x . It also defines other basic number-theoretic functions related to primes like Chebyshev's functions ϑ and ψ and the “ n -th prime number” function p n . We also show various bounds and relationship between these functions are shown. Lastly, we derive Mertens' First and Second Theorem, i. e. ∑ p ≤ x ln p / p = ln x + O (1) and ∑ p ≤ x 1/ p = ln ln x + M + O (1/ln x ). We also give explicit bounds for the remainder terms. The proof of the Prime Number Theorem builds on a library of Dirichlet series and analytic combinatorics. We essentially follow the presentation by Newman. The core part of the proof is a Tauberian theorem for Dirichlet series, which is proven using complex analysis and then used to strengthen Mertens' First Theorem to ∑ p ≤ x ln p / p = ln x + c + o (1). A variant of this proof has been formalised before by Harrison in HOL Light, and formalisations of Selberg's elementary proof exist both by Avigad et al. in Isabelle and by Carneiro in Metamath. The advantage of the analytic proof is that, while it requires more powerful mathematical tools, it is considerably shorter and clearer. This article attempts to provide a short and clear formalisation of all components of that proof using the full range of mathematical machinery available in Isabelle, staying as close as possible to Newman's simple paper proof.
      0 references