Complete sets need not be reduced in Minkowski spaces (Q747572)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Complete sets need not be reduced in Minkowski spaces |
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Complete sets need not be reduced in Minkowski spaces |
scientific article |
Statements
Complete sets need not be reduced in Minkowski spaces (English)
0 references
16 October 2015
0 references
The diameter of a convex body in a Minkowski space may be defined as the maximum distance between any pair of parallel supporting hyperplanes. The body is called diametrally complete if every proper superset has strictly greater diameter. Likewise, the thickness of the body is defined as the minimum distance between any pair of parallel supporting hyperplanes; and the body is called reduced if every proper subset has strictly smaller thickness. In a Euclidean space, every complete convex body has constant width and therefore is reduced. A reasonable conjecture would be that every complete convex body in a Minkowski space is also reduced; this turns out to be be false. In this paper Minkowski spaces of arbitrarily high dimension are exhibited, in each of which some simplex is diametrally complete set but not reduced.
0 references
bodies of constant width
0 references
(diametrically) complete sets
0 references
Hadamard matrix
0 references
Minkowski geometry
0 references
reduced body
0 references
Walsh matrix
0 references
0.866374135017395
0 references
0.8587316274642944
0 references
0.8562164306640625
0 references
0.8344742059707642
0 references
0.8275222182273865
0 references