The logic of \(\Pi_ 1\)-conservativity (Q749519)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4172947
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    The logic of \(\Pi_ 1\)-conservativity
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4172947

      Statements

      The logic of \(\Pi_ 1\)-conservativity (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      1990
      0 references
      The modal propositional provability logic L (or G) has the following axioms: (L1) tautologies, (L2) \(\square (A\to B)\to (\square A\to \square B)\), (L3) \(\square A\to \square \square A\) and (L4) \(\square (\square A\to A)\to \square A\). Its deduction rules are modus ponens and generalizations (if \(\vdash A\), then \(\vdash \square A)\). The interpretability logic IL extends the language with the binary modality \(\triangleright\) and has the following extra axioms: (J1) \(\square (A\to B)\to (A\triangleright B)\), (J2) \((A\triangleright B \& B\triangleright C)\to (A\triangleright C)\), (J3) \((A\triangleright C \& B\triangleright C)\to (A\vee B\triangleright C)\), (J4) \(A\triangleright B\to (\diamondsuit A\to \diamondsuit B)\) and (J5) \(\diamondsuit A\triangleright A\). ILM (Interpretability Logic with Montagna's principle) results by adding the axiom \((A\triangleright B)\to (A \& \square C)\triangleright (B \& \square C).\) \(I\Sigma_ 1\) is the fragment of Peano arithmetic with induction restricted to \(\Sigma_ 1\)-formulas. Let \(T\supseteq I\Sigma_ 1\) be \(\Sigma_ 1\)-sound. An arithmetical p(artial) c(onservativity) interpretation of ILM in T is by definition a mapping * associating with each formula of ILM a sentence of T such that (1) * commutes with the connectives, (2) \((\square A)^*:=\Pr_ T(A^*)\), where \(\Pr_ T\) is the provability predicate of T, and (3) \((A\triangleright B)^*:=(\forall z\Pi_ 1\)-sentence) \((\Pr_ T(B^*\to z)\to \Pr_ T(A^*\to z))\), i.e., the \(\Pi_ 1\)-consequences of \(T+A^*\) include the \(\Pi_ 1\)-consequences of \(T+B^*.\) ILM is sound for arithmetical pc-interpretations, i.e., if ILM\(\vdash A\), then \(T\vdash A^*\) for each *. The authors prove in this paper the following arithmetical completeness theorem. If \(T\supseteq I\Sigma_ 1\) is \(\Sigma_ 1\)-sound, then ILM is complete with respect to arithmetical pc-interpretations, i.e., if not ILM\(\vdash A\), then there is a pc- interpretation * such that not \(T\vdash A^*\).
      0 references
      modal propositional provability logic
      0 references
      Interpretability Logic with Montagna's principle
      0 references
      fragment of Peano arithmetic
      0 references
      arithmetical pc- interpretations
      0 references
      arithmetical completeness theorem
      0 references

      Identifiers