Small cancellation theory and automatic groups (Q750615)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Small cancellation theory and automatic groups
scientific article

    Statements

    Small cancellation theory and automatic groups (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1990
    0 references
    Let G be a group with generating set X, and let \(\Gamma\) be the Cayley graph of G with respect to X. We can regard \(\Gamma\) as a metric space by giving each edge unit length. We can then consider imposing conditions on this metric space. The most well-known example of this is the hyperbolicity condition imposed by \textit{M. Gromov} [in: Essays in Group Theory, Publ., Math. Sci. Res. Inst. 8, 75-263 (1987; Zbl 0634.20015)]. Another condition is the automaticity condition. This requires a constant \(k>0\) and a path in the Cayley graph for each \(g\in G\) (starting at 1 and ending at g) such that paths which end a distance 1 apart stay within a distance k of each other, and such that the words defined by the paths constitute a regular language in the free monoid on \(X\cup X^{-1}\). As the authors show, hyperbolic groups are automatic. The main aim of this wide-ranging paper is to show that if G is given by a finite presentation satisfying the small cancellation conditions C(p), T(q) \(((p,q)=(6,3),(4,4),(3,6))\), and if all pieces have length 1 and no relator is a proper power, then G is automatic. In addition, the authors give some new examples of groups satisfying the C(3), T(6) conditions (for other examples see \textit{M. El-Mosalamy} and \textit{S. J. Pride} [Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 102, 443-451 (1987; Zbl 0654.20032)]; \textit{M. Edjvet} and \textit{J. Howie} [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., III. Ser. 57, 301-328 (1988; Zbl 0627.20020)]; \textit{J. Howie} [Forum Math. 1, 251-272 (1989; Zbl 0676.20018)]). These examples are groups of isometries of certain Bruhat-Tits buildings. The groups are of cohomological dimension 2 (being torsion-free small cancellation groups), and neither they nor their subgroups of finite index can act on a tree without fixing a point (this follows from the fact that the groups have Kazhdan's property T). (For other examples of finitely presented groups of cohomological dimension 2 with no non-trivial action on a tree, see \textit{S. J. Pride} [J. Pure Appl. Algebra 29, 167-168 (1983; Zbl 0513.20019)].) In an appendix to the paper the authors give a proof of the ``if'' part of the following characterization of hyperbolic groups due to Gromov: A group is hyperbolic if and only if it is finitely presented and satisfies a linear isoperimetric inequality.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Cayley graphs
    0 references
    hyperbolicity condition
    0 references
    automaticity condition
    0 references
    words
    0 references
    hyperbolic groups
    0 references
    finite presentations
    0 references
    small cancellation conditions
    0 references
    relators
    0 references
    groups of isometries
    0 references
    Bruhat-Tits buildings
    0 references
    cohomological dimension
    0 references
    subgroups of finite index
    0 references
    actions on trees
    0 references
    isoperimetric inequality
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references