Intensional vs extensional probabilities from their origins to Laplace (Q752672)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Publication:752672 |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4179306
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Intensional vs extensional probabilities from their origins to Laplace |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4179306 |
Statements
Intensional vs extensional probabilities from their origins to Laplace (English)
0 references
1991
0 references
This is a study of an anonymous paper ``Calculation of the credibility of human testimony'' (1699) and its comparison with the relevant considerations of J. Bernoulli (with his ``pure'' and ``mixed'' arguments) and Laplace. The authors conclude that the 17th-century notion of degree of certitude measures the correctness of the ``internal state of the witness''. They do not explain the meaning of the adjectives used in the title of their article, while commenting on the contribution of J. Craig (1699) they fail to mention S. Stigler's recent interpretation of his mathematics.
0 references
credibility
0 references
posterior probability
0 references
0.7472425103187561
0 references
0.7160954475402832
0 references