Construction of irreducible unitary representations of amalgams of discrete Abelian groups (Q755911)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4190049
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Construction of irreducible unitary representations of amalgams of discrete Abelian groups
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4190049

      Statements

      Construction of irreducible unitary representations of amalgams of discrete Abelian groups (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      1990
      0 references
      Let \(G=*_ ZG_ i\) be an amalgamated product of discrete abelian groups \(G_ i\) over a common subgroup Z such that the index of Z in each \(G_ i\) is infinite whenever \(G_ i\) is infinite. Denote by \({\mathcal M}\) the collection of all infinite maximal-abelian subgroups of G. If \(H\in {\mathcal M}\), then either H is self-normalizing or it has index 2 in its normalizer N(H). Let us write \({\mathcal M}_+=\{H\in {\mathcal M}:\) \(N(H)=H\}\), and \({\mathcal M}_ -=\{H\in {\mathcal M}:| N(H)/H| =2\}\). If \(H\in {\mathcal M}_ -\), then \(H=Z\times <h>\) for some \(h\in H\), and \(ghg^{- 1}=z_ 0h^{-1}\) for some \(z_ 0\) in Z and for every g in N(H)\(\setminus H.\) This paper studies representations of G induced from characters of \(H\in {\mathcal M}\). It is proved that, if \(\chi\),\(\psi\) are unitary characters of H,K\(\in {\mathcal M}\) respectively, then \(Ind^ G_ H\chi\) and \(Ind^ G_ K\chi\) are either equivalent or disjoint. They are equivalent if and only if K is a conjugate of H, and \(\psi\) is the corresponding conjugate representation of \(\chi\). Moreover, \(Ind^ G_ H\chi\) is irreducible if \(H\in {\mathcal M}_+\). If \(H\in {\mathcal M}_ -\), \(H=Z\times <h>\), then \(Ind^ G_ H\chi\) is irreducible if \(\chi (h)^ 2\neq \chi (z_ 0)\), and decomposes as the direct sum of two irreducibles otherwise. In particular, for every \(H\in {\mathcal M}\), \(Ind^ G_ H\chi\) is irreducible for almost every \(\chi\) with respect to Haar measure \(d\chi\) on H. Finally, the regular representation \(\lambda_ G\) admits the direct integral decomposition \(\lambda_ G\simeq \int^{\oplus}_{\hat H}Ind^ G_ H\chi d\chi\). If H,K\(\in {\mathcal M}\) are not conjugate, then the corresponding direct integral decompositions of \(\lambda_ G\) are disjoint (recall that, in nontrivial cases, G is not a type I group, and \(\lambda_ G\) has many different integral decompositions).
      0 references
      induced representations
      0 references
      amalgamated product
      0 references
      discrete abelian groups
      0 references
      maximal-abelian subgroups
      0 references
      unitary characters
      0 references
      direct sum
      0 references
      Haar measure
      0 references
      regular representation
      0 references
      direct integral decompositions
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references