Natural selection and population density-feedback I, II (Q761381)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3885705
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Natural selection and population density-feedback I, II
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3885705

      Statements

      Natural selection and population density-feedback I, II (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      1984
      0 references
      The nature of the functional response may be qualitatively understood as follows. Sigmoid responses to one food type may arise, in the presence of alternate foods, as a result of optimal feeding and foraging behavior. Sigmoid curves resulting from this cause I term class A curves. The same curve may also arise in the absence of alternate foods as a result of learning, individual variations in the level of food density at which predators begin feeding, or training effects. The latter I have termed class B curves. At very high food densities, a drop in food intake per predator might occur because of the tendency for predators to take easily found and captured items first and to become more selective when food is very common. Such ''dome-shaped'' curves have been found in the laboratory but should be rare in nature. Computer simulation of a three trophic-level system, using the phenotypic selection model, indicates that natural selection acting on prey should encourage sigmoidality in the predator's class B functional response, at least in disturbed environments. The opposite force arises from selection acting on predators. However, given the magnitudes of growth efficiencies it appears that at least for terrestrial vertebrates, selection on prey species is more important than selection on predators for determining functional responses. Accordingly, prey-predator systems occupying highly variable environments are expected to show more marked type III (class B) curves than systems in more stable areas. Finally, the role of functional response for prey-predator stability is discussed.
      0 references
      functional response
      0 references
      Sigmoid responses
      0 references
      optimal feeding
      0 references
      foraging behavior
      0 references
      training effects
      0 references
      phenotypic selection model
      0 references
      natural selection
      0 references
      prey-predator systems
      0 references

      Identifiers