Partial triumph or total failure? (Q762044)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3889468
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Partial triumph or total failure?
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3889468

      Statements

      Partial triumph or total failure? (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      1985
      0 references
      Three examples of incorrect or incomplete proofs by outstanding mathematicians are discussed. They are: Euler's proof (1749) of the fundamental theorem of algebra, Stieltjes' proof (1885) of the Riemann hypothesis and Appell's proof (1926) that Euler's constant is irrational. The author gives short modern versions of the arguments; in the first two cases he indicates where the proofs are wrong or incomplete, in the last case he leaves it to the reader to find out. (Appell also found out himself and retracted his proof within weeks.) He also speculates about the influence these ''proofs'' might have had, for example because they suggested ideas to other mathematicians. He draws no conclusions and ends the article thus: ''Perhaps in the final analysis, the significance of an idea depends on the imagination and creativity of those dealing with it.''
      0 references
      proofs
      0 references
      Stieltjes
      0 references
      Riemann hypothesis
      0 references
      Appell
      0 references
      Euler's constant
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references