Elliptic curves over finite fields with Fibonacci numbers of points (Q782954)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Elliptic curves over finite fields with Fibonacci numbers of points
scientific article

    Statements

    Elliptic curves over finite fields with Fibonacci numbers of points (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    29 July 2020
    0 references
    The paper studies and solves a curious problem: let \(E\)\, be an elliptic curve defined over a finite field \(\mathbb{F}_q\)\, with \(\sharp(E)=q+1-a\)\, and let us denote \(E_m(q,a);\,\, m\ge 1\)\, the number of points of \(E\)\, over \(\mathbb{F}_{q^m}\); let \(\{F_n\}_{n\ge 1}\)\, be the Fibonacci sequence. When the intersection of \(\{E_m(q,a)\}_{m\ge 1}\)\, and \(\{F_n\}_{n\ge 1}\)\, has two elements at least?, i.e. to find the solutions of \(\sharp E_{m_1} = F_{n_1}\),\, \(\sharp E_{m_2} = F_{n_2}\), etc. Section 1 discusses the problem and formulates the obtained result (Theorem 1.1): the cardinal of the intersection is two for four couples \((q,a)\)\, and three in only a case (for \(q=a=2\)). The rest of the paper is devoted to the proof of that theorem. Section 2 studies the equation \(E_m(q,a)=F_n\)\, in terms of linear forms in logarithms and discusses how the problem can be reduced to three cases: (i) \(q\)\, small (\(q\le 10.000\)), (ii) \(n_1\)\, small and (iii) \(m_2\)\, small. This provides a list of the possible values for \(q\). Section 3 gathers some necessary tools regarding linear forms in logarithms and continued fractions. Assuming proved that \(n_2\le 1.000\)\, Section 4 first studies the problem for \(q\le 10.000\)\, and, using the computational package \texttt{Mathematica} finds the five solutions of Theorem 1.1. Then, for \(q> 10.000\),\, also using Mathematica, proves that there is no solution. The rest of the paper assumes \(n_2> 1.000\)\, and Section 5 to 10 deals with the three cases (i), (ii) and (iii) and, always with the computational help of Mathematica (the paper says that ``the total calculation time for the Mathematica software for this paper was 20 days on 25 parallel desktop computers'') finishes the proof of Theorem 1.1.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Fibonacci numbers
    0 references
    elliptic curves
    0 references
    linear forms in logarithms
    0 references
    Baker-Davenport reduction
    0 references