Freeness of hyperplane arrangements between Boolean arrangements and Weyl arrangements of type \(B_{\ell}\) (Q783056)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7226044
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Freeness of hyperplane arrangements between Boolean arrangements and Weyl arrangements of type \(B_{\ell}\)
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7226044

      Statements

      Freeness of hyperplane arrangements between Boolean arrangements and Weyl arrangements of type \(B_{\ell}\) (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      30 July 2020
      0 references
      In this nicely written paper the authors study the freeness of signed-graphic arrangements (Weyl subarrangements of type \(B\)). Let \(\mathbb{K}\) be an arbitrary field, \(S = \mathbb{K}[x_{1}, \dots, x_{\ell}]\), and let \(\mathcal{A}\) be a central arrangement in the \(\ell\)-dimensional vector space \(\mathbb{K}^{\ell}\). Denote by \(\chi(\mathcal{A};t)\) the characteristic polynomial of \(\mathcal{A}\). We define the module of logarithmic derivations for \(\mathcal{A}\) by \[ D(\mathcal{A}) = \{ \theta \in\mathrm{Der}(S) : \theta(\alpha_{H}) \in \alpha_{H}\cdot S \text{ for any hyperplane } H \in \mathcal{A}\}, \] where \(\alpha_{H}\) denotes a defining linear form of \(H \in \mathcal{A}\). We say that \(\mathcal{A}\) is free if \(D(\mathcal{A})\) is a free \(S\)-module. For each hyperplane \(H \in \mathcal{A}\) we define the restriction \(\mathcal{A}^{H}\) by \[ \mathcal{A}^{H} = \{ H \cap K : K \in \mathcal{A} \setminus \{H\}\}. \] Now we can define recursively the divisional freeness, namely \begin{itemize} \item[i)] the empty arrangement \(\Phi_{\ell}\) is divisionally free; \item[ii)] if there exists \(H \in \mathcal{A}\) such that \(\mathcal{A}^{H}\) is divisionally free and \(\chi(\mathcal{A}^{H};t)\) divides \(\chi(\mathcal{A};t)\), then \(\mathcal{A}\) is divisionally free. \end{itemize} Let us consider a signed graph \(G = (G^{+},G^{-})\), where \(G^{+} = (V_{G},E_{G}^{+})\) and \(G^{-} = (V_{G},E_{G}^{-})\) are simple graphs on a common set of vertices \(V_{G}\) -- here we de not consider graphs with loops, half edges, etc. Let \(\mathbb{K}\) be a field of characteristic zero. For each signed graph \(G\) on the vertex set \(\{1, \dots, \ell\}\) we define the signed-graphic arrangement \(\mathcal{A}(G)\) in the space \(\mathbb{K}^{\ell}\) by \[ \mathcal{A}(G) = \{ x_{i}=0 : 1 \leq i \leq \ell \} \cup\{ x_{i} - x_{j} = 0 : \{i,j\} \in E_{G}^{+}\} \cup \{ x_{i} + x_{j} = 0 : \{i,j\} \in E_{G}^{-}\}. \] Note that a signed-graphic arrangements \(\mathcal{A}(G)\) is a Weyl subarrangement of type \(B\) containing a Boolean arrangement. Here is the main result of the paper under review. Main Result. Let \(G\) be a signed graph. Then the following conditions are equivalent: \begin{itemize} \item[1)] \(G\) is balanced chordal, has no induced subgraphs isomorphic to unbalanced cycles of length three or more, and it does not induces subgraphs which are switching equivalent to the graphs presented in Figure 1 in the paper; \item[2)] \(\mathcal{A}(G)\) is divisionally free; \item[3)] \(\mathcal{A}(G)\) is free. \end{itemize}
      0 references
      0 references
      hyperplane arrangements
      0 references
      Weyl arrangements
      0 references
      signed graphs
      0 references
      freeness
      0 references

      Identifiers