Simple rings whose lower radicals are atoms (Q791608)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Simple rings whose lower radicals are atoms
scientific article

    Statements

    Simple rings whose lower radicals are atoms (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    Andrunakievich and Ryabukhin have asked for a description of all simple rings S such that the lower radical L(S) is an atom in the lattice of radicals. In his paper [Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 36, 57-62 (1980; Zbl 0464.16005)] \textit{E. R. Puczyłowski} has proved that L(S) is an atom whenever S is a simple ring with identity. The author shows that if the simple ring S satisfies \((*)\quad S\quad ideal\) in R and \(R/S\cong S\Rightarrow \exists I\quad ideal\) in R such that \(R=S\oplus I\) then L(S) is an atom. Of course, every simple ring with identity satisfies (*). Non-unital examples of simple rings satisfying (*) have been obtained by \textit{W. G. Leavitt} [Period. Math. Hung. 12, 129-140 (1981; Zbl 0439.16006)] and by \textit{W. G. Leavitt} and the reviewer in their paper [Publ. Math. 29, 95- 99 (1982; Zbl 0505.16007)]. Examples of rings which fail to satisfy (*), are the zero rings Z(p)\(\circ\) on cyclic groups of prime order p. Also L(Z(p)\(\circ)\) is not an atom, since \(L(Z(p^{\infty}))\varsubsetneq L(Z(p)\circ).\) However, it is unknown whether (*) is necessary in order that L(S) be an atom. The author shows that there are \(''Z(p^{\infty})\)-like'' rings R having a simple ring S as an ideal such that \(L(R)\varsubsetneq L(S),\) i.e. L(S) is not an atom. In fact, L(S) is an atom implies the non-existence of a ring R with a chain \(0=I_ 0\triangleleft I_ 1\triangleleft I_ 2\triangleleft...\triangleleft I_ n\triangleleft I_{n+1}\triangleleft...\) such that \(I_{n+1}/I_ n\cong S\) for each n, \(R=\cup_{n\geq 0}I_ n\) and R has no ideals but the \(I_ n.\) An example of a ring S (besides Z(p)\(\circ)\), is the ring F(K) of linear transformations of finite rank of an \(\aleph_ 0\)-dimensional K-vector space, where K is a field. Leavitt and the reviewer have shown that F(K) satisfies the above conditions for S [cf. \textit{W. G. Leavitt} and \textit{L. C. A. van Leeuwen}, Ring Theory, Proc. Antwerp Conf. 1978, Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math. 51, 783-798 (1979; Zbl 0427.16019)]. Thus L(F(K)) is not an atom. For non- associative rings, the author constructs a \(''Z(p^{\infty})\)-like'' ring for a simple ring. Hence he obtains: let S be a simple ring. Then L(S) is not an atom in the lattice of all radicals.
    0 references
    simple rings
    0 references
    lower radical
    0 references
    atom in the lattice of radicals
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references