Necessary and sufficient conditions for the Robbins-Monro method (Q792727)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3854242
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Necessary and sufficient conditions for the Robbins-Monro method
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3854242

      Statements

      Necessary and sufficient conditions for the Robbins-Monro method (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      1984
      0 references
      Consider the Robbins-Monro method \(X_{n+1}=X_ n-a_ nf(X_ n)+a_ n\xi_ n\), \(a_ n\cong c/n\), \(c>0\), \(n=0,1,...\). This paper shows that the law of large numbers \(\lim_{n\to \infty}a_ n\sum^{n- 1}_{j=1}\xi_ j=0\) is necessary and sufficient for the convergence of \(X_ n\) to \(\theta\) of the unknown f, almost surely or in \(L_ p\), \(p\geq 2\), and the weak law of large numbers \(\lim_{n\to \infty}a_ n\sum^{n-1}_{j=0}\xi_ j=0\) is neither necessary nor sufficient for the convergence of \(X_ n\) to \(\theta\) in probability. The proof is carried out by embedding the R-M method in a continuous- parameter RM differential equation \(X(t)=- a(t)f(X(t))+a(t)\xi(t)+a(t)\zeta(t)\), where a(t)\(\zeta\) (t) is the error due to embedding and tends to zero in some probabilistic sense as \(t\to \infty\). Counter-examples for non-convergence in probability are presented.
      0 references
      differential inequalities
      0 references
      embedded differential equation
      0 references
      Lyapunov function
      0 references
      Robbins-Monro method
      0 references
      law of large numbers
      0 references
      weak law of large numbers
      0 references
      Counter-examples for non-convergence in probability
      0 references

      Identifiers