Why mathematical morphology needs complete lattices (Q811477)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4215872
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Why mathematical morphology needs complete lattices
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4215872

      Statements

      Why mathematical morphology needs complete lattices (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      1990
      0 references
      If \(L\) is a complete lattice, then \(d: L\to L\) is a dilatation (erosion) operator, if for any \(S\subseteq L\) \[ d(\sup S)=\sup_{X\in S}d(X)\qquad (d(\inf S)=\inf_{X\in S}d(X)). \] This is a generalization of the case that \(L\) is a power set of \(\mathbb Z^ d\). It is shown, that this generalization is necessary for a mathematically coherent application of morphological operators to grey-level images.
      0 references
      complete lattice
      0 references
      dilatation (erosion)
      0 references
      grey-level images
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers