\(A\)-compactness and minimal subalgebras of \(C(X)\) (Q812477)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5000994
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    \(A\)-compactness and minimal subalgebras of \(C(X)\)
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5000994

      Statements

      \(A\)-compactness and minimal subalgebras of \(C(X)\) (English)
      0 references
      24 January 2006
      0 references
      Let \(X\) be a Tychonoff space and \(\Sigma(X)\) denote the set of subalgebras \(A\) of the ring \(C(X)\) of continuous mappings from \(X\) into the real field \(\mathbb R\). A maximal ideal \(M\) of \(A\) is said to be real in case \(A/M = \mathbb R\); otherwise \(M\) is hyperreal. We say that \(X\) is \(A\)-compact in case \(M\) real implies \(M\) fixed. Thus \(X\) realcompact implies that \(X\) is \(C\)-compact. The following question has been floating for some time. If \(X\) is realcompact, then is there a minimal member \(A\in \Sigma(X)\) such that \(X\) is \(A\)-compact? \textit{S. K. Acharyya, K. C. Chattopadhyay}, and \textit{D. P. Ghosh} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 125, 611--615 (1997; Zbl 0858.54014)] defined a pre-order on \(\Sigma(X)\) different from set inclusion which provides an affirmative answer. They also conjectured that the answer is generally negative with respect to set inclusion. In the present paper the authors show that if \(X\) is realcompact but not compact, then the answer is indeed negative with respect to set inclusion.
      0 references
      minimal subalgebra
      0 references
      realcompact space
      0 references
      Stone-Čech compactification
      0 references
      convex ring
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references