Counting conjugacy classes in the unipotent radical of parabolic subgroups of \(\text{GL}_n(q)\). (Q848762)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Counting conjugacy classes in the unipotent radical of parabolic subgroups of \(\text{GL}_n(q)\).
    scientific article

      Statements

      Counting conjugacy classes in the unipotent radical of parabolic subgroups of \(\text{GL}_n(q)\). (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      23 February 2010
      0 references
      Let \(G=\mathrm{GL}_n(q)\) be the general linear group over the field \(\mathbb{F}_q\) with \(q\) elements, where \(q\) is a power of a prime \(p\). It has been conjectured by \textit{G. Higman} [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., III. Ser. 10, 24-30 (1960; Zbl 0093.02603)] that the number of conjugacy classes of a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(G\) is given by a polynomial in \(q\) with integer coefficients. In this note the authors consider a natural extension of this question: given a parabolic subgroup \(P\) of \(G\), let \(U=O_p(P)\) denote the largest normal \(p\)-subgroup of \(P\). Then is the number of conjugacy classes in \(U\) given by a polynomial in \(q\) with integer coefficients (Higman's original conjecture is the case where \(P\) is a Borel subgroup of \(G\))? The main result of the paper is an affirmative answer to this question when the parabolic subgroup \(P\) is the stabilizer of a flag in \(\mathbb{F}_q^n\) of length at most \(5\). The proof of this result relies on translating the problem into a representation theoretic setting, where conjugacy classes in \(U\) correspond to a class of modules for a certain algebra. Also essential is a result of \textit{L. Hille} and \textit{G. Röhrle} [Transform. Groups 4, No. 1, 35-52 (1999; Zbl 0924.20035)] about the action by conjugation of a parabolic subgroup \(\mathbf P\) of \(\mathrm{GL}_n(\overline\mathbb{F}_q)\) on its unipotent radical \(\mathbf U\), where \(\overline\mathbb{F}_q\) denotes the algebraic closure of \(\mathbb{F}_q\). This result says that the number of \(\mathbf P\)-classes in \(\mathbf U\) is finite precisely when \(\mathbf P\) is the stabilizer of a flag of length at most \(5\) in \(\overline\mathbb{F}_q^n\); moreover, in these cases, the parameterization of the classes is independent of \(q\). This is the reason for the restriction on the length of flags in the main result.
      0 references
      0 references
      Higman conjecture
      0 references
      parabolic subgroups
      0 references
      unipotent radicals
      0 references
      general linear groups
      0 references
      numbers of conjugacy classes
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references