On the number of Tverberg partitions in the prime power case (Q854837)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    On the number of Tverberg partitions in the prime power case
    scientific article

      Statements

      On the number of Tverberg partitions in the prime power case (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      7 December 2006
      0 references
      \textit{H. Tverberg} showed in [J. Lond. Math. Soc. 41, 123--128 (1966; Zbl 0131.20002)] that any set of \((d+1)(q-1)+1\) points in \(\mathbb R^d\) admits a partition into \(q\) subsets such that the intersection of their convex hulls is nonempty. The result is the best possible; for fewer than this number of points the statemtne does not hold. Placed in a topological setting this becomes: If \(q\geq 2\), \(d\geq 1\), and \(N:=(d+1)(q-1)\), for every affine map \(f: \|\sigma^N\|\to \mathbb R^d\) there are \(q\) disjoint faces \(F_1,\dots,F_q\) of the standard \(N\)-simplex \(\sigma^N\) whose images under \(f\) intersect, \(\bigcap^q_{i=1}f(\|F_i\|)\neq \emptyset\). For \(q\) a prime and \(f\) a continuous map, this was proved by \textit{I. Bárány} et al. [J. Lond. Math. Soc. II. Ser. 23, 158--164 (1981; Zbl 0453.55003)]. The conjecture that there are at least \([(q-1)!]^d\) Tverberg partitions for any set of \((d+1)(q-1)+1\) points in \(\mathbb R^d\) is still unproved. For \(q\) a prime a non-trivial lower bound is known; here this result is extended to the prime power case.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references