Influence and sharp-threshold theorems for monotonic measures (Q858979)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5115533
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Influence and sharp-threshold theorems for monotonic measures
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5115533

      Statements

      Influence and sharp-threshold theorems for monotonic measures (English)
      0 references
      12 January 2007
      0 references
      Let \(\Omega=\{0,1\}^n\) or \([0,1]^n\), let \(K=P(\Omega)\) or the Lebesgue \(\sigma\)-algebra of \(\Omega\), and let \(\mu\) be a probability on \(K\) such that \(\mu(\{\omega\})>0\), \(\omega\in\Omega\), if \(\Omega=\{0,1\}^n\), while \(\mu(A)=\int_{A}\rho \,d\lambda\), \(A\in K\), if \(\Omega=[0,1]^n\), where \(\lambda\) is the Lebesgue measure on \(K\) and \(\rho\) is a positive Lebesgue measurable density. \(\mu\) is assumed to satisfy a certain monotonicity property. Put \(I=\{1,\dots,n\}\). For \(\omega=(\omega_1,\dots,\omega_n)\in\Omega\) and \(i\in I\), define \(X_{i}(\omega)=\omega_{i}\). A set \(A\in K\) is called increasing if \(\omega\in A\) whenever \(\omega'\in A\) and \(\omega\geq\omega'\). If \(A\) is increasing and \(i\in I\), the quantities \(I_{A}(i)=\mu(A\mid X_{i}=1)-\mu(A\mid X_{i}=0)\) are called influences. Here are the main results. Theorem 1. There exists an absolute constant \(c\in(0,\infty)\) such that, for all \(n\) and all increasing \(A\), there is \(i\in I\) satisfying \(I_{A}(i)\geq c(\mu(A)\wedge(1-\mu(A))(\log n)/n\). Theorem 2. Let \(\Pi\) be a subgroup of the group of all permutations of \(I\) such that for any \(i,j\in I\) there is \(\pi\in\Pi\) with \(\pi_{i}=j\), and that \(\mu(\{\omega\})=\mu(\{\pi(\omega)\})\) for all \(\omega\in\Omega\) and \(\pi\in\Pi\), where \(\pi(\omega_1,\dots,\omega_n)=(\omega_{\pi_1},\dots,\omega_{\pi_{n}})\), \(\omega\in\Omega\). For \(\Omega=\{0,1\}^n\) and \(p\in(0,1)\), define the probability \(\mu_{p}\) on \(K\) by \(\mu_{p}(\{\omega\})=C\prod_{i=1}^n p^{\omega_i}(1-p)^{1-\omega_i}\), \(\omega=(\omega_1,\dots,\omega_n)\in\Omega\), where \(C\) is the normalizing constant. Then there exists an absolute constant \(c\in(0,\infty)\) such that, for all \(n\) and all increasing \(A\) with \(A=\pi(A)\), \(\pi\in\Pi\), one has \((d/(dp))\mu_{p}(A)\geq c\xi_{p}(\mu_{p}(A)\wedge(1-\mu_{p}(A))\log n\), where \(\xi_{p}=\int_\Omega X_I \,d\mu_{p}(1-\int_\Omega X_I \,d\mu_{p})/p(1-p)\). These results have applications to problems of discrete probability such as the random cluster model.
      0 references
      influence
      0 references
      sharp threshold
      0 references
      monotonic measure
      0 references
      random cluster model
      0 references
      percolation
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references