Viète's controversy with Clavius over the truly Gregorian calendar (Q860125)
From MaRDI portal
 | This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Viète's controversy with Clavius over the truly Gregorian calendar |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5117882
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Viète's controversy with Clavius over the truly Gregorian calendar |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5117882 |
Statements
Viète's controversy with Clavius over the truly Gregorian calendar (English)
0 references
23 January 2007
0 references
Clavius and Viète disagreed on the cyclical rules that must be used to determine the first Full Moon after March 21, the day of the Spring Equinox. Because Easter is the first Sunday after this first Full Moon and the Gregorian calendar reform was based on Clavius' views, Viète had good reasons to attack Clavius. The author discusses the controversy.
0 references
Viète
0 references
Clavius
0 references
Gregorian calendar
0 references
0.7342748045921326
0 references
0.7212973833084106
0 references
0.6939675211906433
0 references
0.6880136728286743
0 references
