Free and fragmenting filling length. (Q863354)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Free and fragmenting filling length.
    scientific article

      Statements

      Free and fragmenting filling length. (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      26 January 2007
      0 references
      Given finite presentation \(\mathcal P\) of the group \(\Gamma\) there are several functions \(M\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}\) defined for estimation of the maximal length \(\ell(w)\leq n\) of a null-homotopic loop in the Cayley 2-complex \(\text{Cay}^2(\mathcal P)\) corresponding to the word \(w\). The filling length function \(\text{FL}\) was defined by \textit{M. Gromov} [Geometric group theory, Vol. 2: Asymptotic invariants of infinite groups, Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. 182 (1993; Zbl 0841.20039)]. For a null-homotopic word \(w\) the function \(\text{FL}(w)\) is the minimal combinatorial length \(L\) such that \(w\) admits a base-preserving combinatorial null-homotopy through loops of length at most \(L\). The authors introduce free (fragmented free) filling length \(\text{FFL}(w)\) (\(\text{FFFL}(w)\)) of the word \(w\) in a similar way but without the requirement on the base point to be fixed (allowing the contracting loops to bifurcate). All the functions \(\text{FL},\text{FFL},\text{FFFL}\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}\) are quasi-isometric invariants up to the following equivalence \(f\simeq g\) of functions. For \(f,g\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}\) the notation \(f\preceq g\) means that for some constant \(C>0\) we have the inequality \(f(l)\leq Cg(Cl+C)+Cl+C\) for all \(l\in\mathbb{N}\). The equivalence \(f\simeq g\) holds when \(f\preceq g\) and \(g\preceq f\). The authors construct an example of a group \(\Gamma\) with finite aspherical presentation \(\mathcal Q\) such that: (i) there is a sequence of null-homotopic words \(w_n\) with length \(\ell(w_n)=8n+8\), and \(\text{FFL}(w_n)\simeq n\) but \(\text{FL}(w_n)\simeq 2^n\); (ii) the filling functions \(\text{IDiam}\) (intrinsic diameter), \(\text{Area}\) (combinatorial area of van Kampen diagram), \(\text{FL}\), \(\text{FFL}\) and \(\text{FFFL}\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}\) satisfy \[ \text{IDiam}(n)\simeq\text{FL}(n)\simeq \text{FFL}(n)\simeq\text{Area}(n)\simeq 2^n \] but \(\text{FFFL}(n)\simeq n\). A question remains open: does there exist a finite presentation for which \(\text{FL}(n)\not\simeq\text{FFL}(n)\) or \(\text{FFL}(n)\not\simeq\text{FFFL}(n)\)?
      0 references
      finite presentations
      0 references
      quasi-isometry invariants
      0 references
      free filling lengths
      0 references
      van Kampen diagrams
      0 references
      null-homotopies
      0 references
      shellings
      0 references
      filling functions
      0 references
      fragmentations
      0 references
      Cayley complexes
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references