Free and fragmenting filling length. (Q863354)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Free and fragmenting filling length.
scientific article

    Statements

    Free and fragmenting filling length. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    26 January 2007
    0 references
    Given finite presentation \(\mathcal P\) of the group \(\Gamma\) there are several functions \(M\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}\) defined for estimation of the maximal length \(\ell(w)\leq n\) of a null-homotopic loop in the Cayley 2-complex \(\text{Cay}^2(\mathcal P)\) corresponding to the word \(w\). The filling length function \(\text{FL}\) was defined by \textit{M. Gromov} [Geometric group theory, Vol. 2: Asymptotic invariants of infinite groups, Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. 182 (1993; Zbl 0841.20039)]. For a null-homotopic word \(w\) the function \(\text{FL}(w)\) is the minimal combinatorial length \(L\) such that \(w\) admits a base-preserving combinatorial null-homotopy through loops of length at most \(L\). The authors introduce free (fragmented free) filling length \(\text{FFL}(w)\) (\(\text{FFFL}(w)\)) of the word \(w\) in a similar way but without the requirement on the base point to be fixed (allowing the contracting loops to bifurcate). All the functions \(\text{FL},\text{FFL},\text{FFFL}\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}\) are quasi-isometric invariants up to the following equivalence \(f\simeq g\) of functions. For \(f,g\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}\) the notation \(f\preceq g\) means that for some constant \(C>0\) we have the inequality \(f(l)\leq Cg(Cl+C)+Cl+C\) for all \(l\in\mathbb{N}\). The equivalence \(f\simeq g\) holds when \(f\preceq g\) and \(g\preceq f\). The authors construct an example of a group \(\Gamma\) with finite aspherical presentation \(\mathcal Q\) such that: (i) there is a sequence of null-homotopic words \(w_n\) with length \(\ell(w_n)=8n+8\), and \(\text{FFL}(w_n)\simeq n\) but \(\text{FL}(w_n)\simeq 2^n\); (ii) the filling functions \(\text{IDiam}\) (intrinsic diameter), \(\text{Area}\) (combinatorial area of van Kampen diagram), \(\text{FL}\), \(\text{FFL}\) and \(\text{FFFL}\colon\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}\) satisfy \[ \text{IDiam}(n)\simeq\text{FL}(n)\simeq \text{FFL}(n)\simeq\text{Area}(n)\simeq 2^n \] but \(\text{FFFL}(n)\simeq n\). A question remains open: does there exist a finite presentation for which \(\text{FL}(n)\not\simeq\text{FFL}(n)\) or \(\text{FFL}(n)\not\simeq\text{FFFL}(n)\)?
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    finite presentations
    0 references
    quasi-isometry invariants
    0 references
    free filling lengths
    0 references
    van Kampen diagrams
    0 references
    null-homotopies
    0 references
    shellings
    0 references
    filling functions
    0 references
    fragmentations
    0 references
    Cayley complexes
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references