The Lindelöf principle in several complex variables (Q865334)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The Lindelöf principle in several complex variables
scientific article

    Statements

    The Lindelöf principle in several complex variables (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    14 February 2007
    0 references
    The most classical formulation of the Lindelöf principle on the disc is as follows: Let \(f\) be a bounded, holomorphic function on the unit disc \(\mathbb D\subseteq\mathbb C\). Suppose that the radial limit \[ \lim_{r\to1-0} f(re^{i\theta})\equiv\lambda\in\mathbb C \tag{1} \] exists at the boundary point \(e^{i\theta}\). Then in fact \(f\) has nontangential limit \(\lambda\) at \(e^{i\theta}\). Thus we have a sort of Tauberian theorem: for bounded holomorphic functions, radial convergence implies nontangential convergence. It is of interest to have a result of this nature in several complex variables. Pioneering work on the Lindelöf principle in several complex variables was done by E. Chirka. Then Cima and Krantz established a Lindelöf principle for holomorphic functions of several variables [\textit{J. A. Cima} and \textit{S. G. Krantz} [Duke Math. J. 50, 303--328 (1983; Zbl 0522.32003)]. That result was new and optimal in the following senses: (i) It was proved for normal functions, in a sense the most natural function space for which to consider a Lindelöf principle. (ii) It was formulated in terms of the Kobayashi metric, thus providing an ``optimal'' result in terms of the intrinsic Levi geometry of the domain. But the result of Cima-Krantz has certain drawbacks. Notable among these is that, whereas the most natural mode of boundary convergence in the several variable setting is admissible convergence, that used in the Cima-Krantz results is hypoadmissible convergence -- a strictly weaker concept. The Cima-Krantz result is in fact false for admissible convergence. In addition, when the radial curve, as in (1), is replaced by a fairly arbitrary curve -- especially by a curve with a significant complex tangential component -- then a rather unsatisfying result is obtained. In the present paper, the author introduces new techniques that address the shortcomings of the Cima-Krantz result and produce a sharp version of the Lindelöf principle. Inspired by the classical result, as improved later by Lehto and Virtanen, this new result meshes closely with the well-established Fatou theorems of Koranyi and Stein. In particular, this is a Lindelöf principle for admissible approach regions. Let \(\mathbb B^n\) be the unit ball in \(\mathbb C^n\). For \(P=(p_1,p_2,\dots,p_n)\in\partial\mathbb B^n\) and \(\alpha>1\), let the admissible approach region of aperture \(\alpha\) at \(P\) be \(\mathcal A_\alpha(P) =\left\{z\in\mathbb B^n: | 1-z\cdot \bar P| <\alpha(1-| z| )\right\}.\) Here \(z\cdot \bar P = \sum_jz_j\bar P_j\). This region is of nontangential shape in the complex normal direction at \(P\) and of parabolic shape in the complementary, complex tangential direction. The author formulates a more sophisticated version of the Lindelöf principle on the ball as follows: Let \(f\) be a bounded, holomorphic function on the unit ball \(\mathbb B^2\). Let \[ T = \left\{(s +i0,t + i0): s, t\in\mathbb R, 0<s <1, 0 < | t| < \sqrt{2 -2s}\right\}. \] Suppose that \(\rho : T\to\mathbb R^2\) is a \(C^2\) function, with bounded first and second derivatives, such that (writing \(\rho(s, t) = (\rho_1(s, t), \rho_2(s, t))\)) \[ \mathcal T = \left\{(s + i\rho_1(s, t), t + i\rho_2(s, t)): (s,t)\in T\right\} \] is a two-dimensional, totally real manifold in \(\mathbb B^2\). Let \({\mathbf 1} = (1 + i0, 0 + i0)\). Suppose that \(\lim_{\mathcal T\ni z\to\mathbf1}\! f(z)\!\equiv\!\lambda\in\mathbb C\) exists. Then, for any \(\alpha\!>\!1\), \(\lim_{\mathcal A_\alpha({\mathbf 1})\ni z\to{\mathbf 1}} f(z) =\lambda.\) The author further adapts the new principle to the Levi geometry of various domains. In common with the Cima-Krantz result the author proves the result not only for bounded holomorphic functions but also for normal functions. The results in this paper improve on earlier results of Chirka, Cima-Krantz, Abate, and Abate-Tauraso.
    0 references
    Lindelöf principle on the unit ball
    0 references
    boundary convergence in the se\-ve\-ral variable setting
    0 references
    boundary behavior
    0 references
    admissible approach regions
    0 references
    bounded holomorphic functions
    0 references
    normal functions
    0 references
    Levi geometry
    0 references

    Identifiers