Generic stabilisers for actions of reductive groups (Q903173)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Generic stabilisers for actions of reductive groups
scientific article

    Statements

    Generic stabilisers for actions of reductive groups (English)
    0 references
    5 January 2016
    0 references
    Let \(G\) be a reductive linear algebraic group over an algebraically closed field \(k\) and \(V\) a quasi-projective \(G\) variety such that \(G\) permutes the irreducible components of \(V\) transitively. In the present paper the author studies the stabilizers under this action in arbitrary characterstic. Let \(V_0\) denote the set of points such that \(\dim(G_v)\) is minimal and let \(V_{\mathrm{red}} = \{ v \in V_0 \;| \;G_v \text{ is reductive }\}\). The first main result is that \(V_{\mathrm{red}}\) is an open subvariety of \(V\). Previous results by Richardson [\textit{R. W. Richardson}, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 9, 38--41 (1977; Zbl 0355.14020)] required that generic orbits are closed and that \(V\) is affine. A subgroup \(H\) of \(G\) is called a principal stabilizer for the \(G\)-variety \(V\) if there is a non-empty open subset \(O\) of \(V\) such that \(G_v\) is conjugate to \(H\) for all \(v \in V\). Again by a result of Richardson [\textit{R. W. Richardson}, Invent. Math. 16, 6--14 (1972; Zbl 0242.14010)] principal stabilizers exist if \(\mathrm{char}(k) = 0\) and \(V\) is smooth and affine. The author shows via an example that even if generic stabilizers are connected and reductive, a principal stabilizer need not exist in characteristic \(p\). Therefore the author weakens the notion of principal stabilizer. Let \(H\) be a subgroup of \(G\). Then \(H\) is called \(G\)-completely reducible if whenever \(H\) is contained in a so-called \(R\)-parabolic subgroup \(P\) of \(G\) , there is an \(R\)-Levi subgroup \(L\) of \(P\) such that \(H\) is contained in \(L\). Assume now that \(P\) is a minimal \(R\)-parabolic subgroup containing \(M \leq G\) and let \(\pi_L: P \to L\) denote the canonical projection. Then \(\pi_L(M)\) does not depend on \(P\) and \(L\) up to \(G\)-conjugacy, and the conjugacy class \(G \cdot \pi_L(M)\) is denoted by \(\mathcal{D}(M)\). The second main result is that there exists a \(G\)-completely reducible subgroup \(H\) of \(G\) and a non-empty open subset \(O\) of \(V\) such that \(\mathcal{D}(G_v) = G \cdot H\) for all \(v \in O\). In particular the \(G_v\) are equal for generic \(v\). Under some additional conditions it can be shown that the subgroup \(H\) is even a principal stabilizer.
    0 references
    quasiprojective \(G\)-varieties
    0 references
    generic stabilisers
    0 references
    principal orbit type
    0 references
    \(G\)-complete reducibility
    0 references

    Identifiers