Two normality criteria and counterexamples to the converse of Bloch's principle (Q903965)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Two normality criteria and counterexamples to the converse of Bloch's principle
scientific article

    Statements

    Two normality criteria and counterexamples to the converse of Bloch's principle (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    15 January 2016
    0 references
    The authors consider normality criteria and the converse of Bloch's principle for a family of meromorphic functions. A family of functions meromorphic in a domain and possessing a certain property \(\mathcal P\) is likely to be normal if there is no non-constant function meromorphic in the plane which has this property \(\mathcal P\). This heuristic principle is commonly attributed to Bloch, see, e.g. [\textit{W. Bergweiler}, Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 6, No. 1, 77--108 (2006; Zbl 1101.30034)]. Consider the following two statements: {\parindent=6mm \begin{itemize} \item[(a)] If a meromorphic function satisfies a condition \(\mathcal P\) in the complex plane, then it must be a constant function. \item [(b)] If a family of meromorphic functions satisfies the condition \(\mathcal P\) in an arbitrary complex domain, then the family is normal. \end{itemize}} The Bloch principle can be understood as ``(a) implies (b)''. The authors pay attention for the converse of the Bloch principle as ``(b) implies (a)'', see, e.g. [\textit{K. S. Charak} and \textit{J. Rieppo}, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 353, No. 1, 43--48 (2009; Zbl 1168.30018)]. Two results are obtained in this paper. One of them the following. Let \(\mathcal F\) be a family of meromorphic functions on a domain \(D\). Let \(n\geq 2\), \(m\geq k \geq 1\) be positive integers and let \(a\neq 0\) and \(b\) be two finite values. If, for each \(f\in \mathcal F\), \(f^n(z)(f^m)^{(k)}(z)=a \Longleftrightarrow (f^m)^{(k)}(z)=b\), then the family \(\mathcal F\) is normal on \(D\). This is an extension of a result by \textit{M. L. Fang} and \textit{L. Zalcman} [Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 1, No. 1, 289--299 (2001; Zbl 1045.30020)] to a bigger class of differential polynomials. The Nevanlinna theory and Zalcman's rescaling lemma are useful tools for the proof.
    0 references
    meromorphic functions
    0 references
    normal families
    0 references
    differential polynomials
    0 references
    shared values
    0 references
    small functions
    0 references

    Identifiers