A note on canonical functions (Q912090)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4143969
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | A note on canonical functions |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4143969 |
Statements
A note on canonical functions (English)
0 references
1989
0 references
Given \(f,g\in^{\omega_ 1}\omega_ 1\), put \(f<g\) just in case \(\{\gamma: f(\gamma)\geq g(\gamma)\}\) is nonstationary. We say that a strictly increasing sequence \(f_{\alpha}\in^{\omega_ 1}\omega_ 1\), \(\alpha <\delta\), is canonical if for any other strictly increasing sequence \(g_{\alpha}\in^{\omega_ 1}\omega_ 1\), \(\alpha <\delta\), we have \(f_{\alpha}\leq g_{\alpha}\) for all \(\alpha\). The construction of a canonical sequence of length \(\omega_ 2\) is standard. A. Hajnal has shown that, assuming \(V=L\), there is no canonical sequence of length \(\omega_ 2+1\). Starting from a model of CH, the authors build for any ordinal \(\delta\), a cardinal preserving extension in which there is a canonical sequence of length \(\delta\). The authors point out that this result generalizes to any regular uncountable cardinal \(\kappa\).
0 references
canonical function
0 references
canonical sequence
0 references
0.7859014272689819
0 references
0.7702177166938782
0 references
0.7688542008399963
0 references
0.7643253207206726
0 references
0.7630832195281982
0 references