A note on canonical functions (Q912090)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4143969
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    A note on canonical functions
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4143969

      Statements

      A note on canonical functions (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      1989
      0 references
      Given \(f,g\in^{\omega_ 1}\omega_ 1\), put \(f<g\) just in case \(\{\gamma: f(\gamma)\geq g(\gamma)\}\) is nonstationary. We say that a strictly increasing sequence \(f_{\alpha}\in^{\omega_ 1}\omega_ 1\), \(\alpha <\delta\), is canonical if for any other strictly increasing sequence \(g_{\alpha}\in^{\omega_ 1}\omega_ 1\), \(\alpha <\delta\), we have \(f_{\alpha}\leq g_{\alpha}\) for all \(\alpha\). The construction of a canonical sequence of length \(\omega_ 2\) is standard. A. Hajnal has shown that, assuming \(V=L\), there is no canonical sequence of length \(\omega_ 2+1\). Starting from a model of CH, the authors build for any ordinal \(\delta\), a cardinal preserving extension in which there is a canonical sequence of length \(\delta\). The authors point out that this result generalizes to any regular uncountable cardinal \(\kappa\).
      0 references
      canonical function
      0 references
      canonical sequence
      0 references

      Identifiers