ACM sets of points in multiprojective space (Q934347)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
ACM sets of points in multiprojective space
scientific article

    Statements

    ACM sets of points in multiprojective space (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    29 July 2008
    0 references
    Let \({\mathbb X}\) be a finite set of points in a multiprojective space \({\mathbb P}^{n_1}\times ... \times {\mathbb P}^{n_r}\). \({\mathbb X}\) is arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay (a.C.M.) if its coordinate ring \(R/I_ {\mathbb X}\) is C.M. (i.e. depth \(R/I_ {\mathbb X} = \dim R/I_ {\mathbb X} \)). When \(r=1\), \({\mathbb X}\) is always a.C.M., but for \(r\geq 2\) it is an open problem how to geometrically determine if \({\mathbb X}\) is a.C.M. or not, and to classify a.C.M sets of points. The problem has been widely studied for \(r=2\), \(n_1=n_2=1\) (i.e. on a smooth quadric surface), and in this case a.C.M. sets can be classified via their Hilbert function, moreover we have that \({\mathbb X}\subset {\mathbb P}^{1}\times{\mathbb P}^{1}\) is a.C.M. if and only if whenever it contains \(P_1\times Q_1\) and \(P_2\times Q_2\), then either \(P_1\times Q_2\) or \(P_2\times Q_1\) are in it too (property \(\star\)). In this paper the authors show that if \({\mathbb X}\subset {\mathbb P}^{1}\times{\mathbb P}^{n}\) and is a.C.M. then property \(\star\) holds, but the converse in false (unless \(n=1\)), and give counterexample for \(n=2\). They also prove that we cannot expect that a.C.M. sets of points \({\mathbb X}\subset {\mathbb P}^{n_1}\times...\times{\mathbb P}^{n_r}\) can be classified via their Hilbert function, in general. In the last section the authors study relations between \({\mathbb X}\) being a.C.M. and the (multi)degree of the separators of its points, where a separator of \(P\in {\mathbb X}\) is a form \(F\in R\) such that \(F(P)=0\) and \(F(Q)\neq 0\), \(\forall Q\in {\mathbb X}-\{P\}\), namely they generalize the result (known on the quadric surface) that if \({\mathbb X}\) is a.C.M. then \(\forall P\in {\mathbb X}\) the minimal degree of separators of \(P\) is unique. Moreover, they also show that the converse does not hold in general.
    0 references
    Cohen-Macaulay
    0 references
    multiprojective space
    0 references
    separator
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references