Rigid extensions of algebraic frames (Q976748)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Rigid extensions of algebraic frames
scientific article

    Statements

    Rigid extensions of algebraic frames (English)
    0 references
    16 June 2010
    0 references
    An algebraic frame is said to have FIP in case the meet of two compact elements is compact. By an extension, the author means a pair \((L,M)\) where \(L\) and \(M\) are algebraic frames with FIP, and \(L\) is a subframe of \(M\). This is abbreviated as \(L\leq M\). Such an extension is said to be rigid if for every compact element of \(M\) there is a compact element of \(L\) with the same polar, where polar means what is traditionally referred to as pseudocomplement. An element of an algebraic frame is called a \(d\)-element if it is covered by double-polars of compact elements below it. The symbol \(dL\) denotes the set of all \(d\)-elements of \(L\). Denote by \(\mathfrak{K}(A)\) the set of compact elements of an algebraic frame \(A\). For an extension \(L\leq M\), the map \(\phi\colon dM\to dL\) is defined by \[ \phi(x)={\bigvee}\{c^{\prime\prime}\mid c\in\mathfrak{K}(L),\;c\leq x\}, \] where \((\cdot)^{\prime}\) denotes the polar in the subframe. A beautiful characterization of rigidity states: An extension \(L\leq M\) is rigid iff \(\phi\colon dM\to dL\) is a frame isomorphism. The set of minimal primes of an algebraic frame comes with two topologies. One is the familiar hull-kernel topology, and the other, called the inverse topology, takes for its basic open sets the basic closed sets of the hull-kernel topology. Importing the notions of \(r\)- and \(r^{*}\)-extensions from \(\ell\)-groups, the author characterizes the frame-theoretic versions of these types of extensions in algebraic frames with FIP in terms of inverse topologies. These pretty much parallel similar characterizations were obtained for \(\ell\)-groups by her teacher, \textit{W. Wm. McGovern} [``Neat rings'', J. Pure Appl. Algebra 205, No.~2, 243--265 (2006; Zbl 1095.13025)]. Algebraic frames have, in recent times, received a great deal of attention (some might even say ``onslaught'') from authors such as Jorge Martínez and Eric Zenk, among others. The paper under review is a truly worthy contribution to this vibrant subject. It is well-written, with a number of illuminating examples.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    algebraic frame
    0 references
    rigid extension
    0 references
    inverse topology
    0 references
    0 references