Kallin's lemma for rational convexity (Q991561)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Kallin's lemma for rational convexity
scientific article

    Statements

    Kallin's lemma for rational convexity (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    7 September 2010
    0 references
    A compact subset \(E\) of \(\mathbb C^n\) is said to be polynomially convex if \(K=\widehat{K}:=\{z\in\mathbb C^n:\;|p(z)|\leq\max_K|p|\) for every polynomial \(p\) in \(\mathbb C^n\}\). Similarly, \(K\) is said to be rationally convex if \(K=\widehat{K}_{\mathcal R}:=\{z\in\mathbb C^n: |g(z)|\leq\max_K|g|\) for every rational function \(g\) which is analytic in a neighbourhood of \(K\}\). We have \(K\subset \widehat{K}_{\mathcal R}\subset \widehat{K}\). If \(n=1\), by Runge's theorem, \(K=\widehat{K}\) iff \(\mathbb C\setminus K\) is connected. Note that union of two polynomially convex compact sets may even fail to be rationally convex [\textit{G. Stolzenberg}, Acta Math. 109, 259--289 (1963; Zbl 0122.08404)]. A powerful tool in verifying polynomial convexity of a finite union of polynomially convex sets is the well-known Kallin lemma [\textit{E. Kallin}, Function Algebras, Proc. Int. Symp. Tulane Univ. 1965, 149--152 (1966; Zbl 0142.10104); see also \textit{P. J. de Paepe}, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 33, No.~1, 1--10 (2001; Zbl 1041.32006)]. In this paper, the author establishes an analogue of Kallin's lemma for rational convexity which is the following Theorem. Suppose that 1) \(X_1\) and \(X_2\) are polynomially convex compact subsets of \(\mathbb C^n\); 2) \(Y_1\) and \(Y_2\) are polynomially convex compact subsets of \(\mathbb C\) such that \(Y_2\) is a homeomorphic image of the unit interval [0,1], \(\partial Y_1\) is a continuous Jordan curve and \(E=Y_1\cap Y_2\) has one-dimensional Hausdorff measure zero; 3) \(p\) is a rational function with poles outside \(X_1\cup X_2\) such that \(p(X_1)=Y_1\) and \(p(X_2)=Y_2\); 4) \(p^{-1}(\lambda)\cap(X_1\cup X_2)\) is polynomially convex for every \(\lambda\in E\). Then \(X_1\cup X_2\) is rationally convex. This yields in particular the following nice Corollary. Let \(\varphi\) be a \(\mathcal C^1\)-smooth complex valued function defined on a neighbourhood \(U\) of \(0\in\mathbb C\). Assume that 1) \(\varphi(0)=\frac{\partial\varphi}{\partial z}(0)=\frac{\partial\varphi}{\partial\bar{z}}(0)=0\); 2) \(\{z: \Im \varphi(z)=0\}\) is countable. Let \(M=\{(z,\bar{z}+\varphi(z)): z\in U\}\). Then \(N:=\mathbb R^2\cup M\) is locally rationally convex at the origin, i.e., there exists a closed ball \(B\) centered at 0 such that \(B\cap N\) is rationally convex.
    0 references
    0 references
    polynomial convexity
    0 references
    rational convexity
    0 references
    Kallin's lemma
    0 references
    uniform approximation
    0 references