Letter to editor

From MaRDI portal





Lemma 5 in the author's paper [ibid. 26, No. 3(151), 168-191 (1985; Zbl 0599.45007)] is erroneous, but the only theorem which uses it (Theorem 2) can be (and is) proved without it.











This page was built for publication: Letter to editor

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5905622)