Lifting representations of finite reductive groups. II: Explicit conorms

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: Let k be a field, ildeG a connected reductive k-group, and Gamma a finite group. In a previous work, the authors defined what it means for a connected reductive k-group G to be "parascopic" for (ildeG,Gamma). Roughly, this is a simultaneous generalization of several settings. For example, Gamma could act on ildeG, and G could be the connected part of the group of Gamma-fixed points in ildeG. Or G could be an endoscopic group, a pseudo-Levi subgroup, or an isogenous image of ildeG. If G is such a group, and both ildeG and G are k-quasisplit, then we constructed a map hatmathcalNextst from the set of stable semisimple conjugacy classes in the dual Gwedge(k) to the set of such classes in ildeGwedge(k). When k is finite, this implies a lifting from packets of representations of G(k) to those of ildeG(k). In order to understand such a lifting better, here we describe two ways in which hatmathcalNextst can be made more explicit. First, we can express our map in the general case in terms of simpler cases. We do so by showing that hatmathcalNextst is compatible with isogenies and with Weil restriction, and also by expressing it as a composition of simpler maps. Second, in many cases we can construct an explicit k-morphism hatNcolonGwedgelongrightarrowildeGwedge that agrees with hatmathcalNextst. As a consequence, our lifting of representations is seen to coincide with Shintani lifting in some important cases.











This page was built for publication: Lifting representations of finite reductive groups. II: Explicit conorms

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6169064)