Lower bounds for finding stationary points II: first-order methods

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We establish lower bounds on the complexity of finding epsilon-stationary points of smooth, non-convex high-dimensional functions using first-order methods. We prove that deterministic first-order methods, even applied to arbitrarily smooth functions, cannot achieve convergence rates in epsilon better than epsilon−8/5, which is within epsilon−1/15logfrac1epsilon of the best known rate for such methods. Moreover, for functions with Lipschitz first and second derivatives, we prove no deterministic first-order method can achieve convergence rates better than epsilon−12/7, while epsilon−2 is a lower bound for functions with only Lipschitz gradient. For convex functions with Lipschitz gradient, accelerated gradient descent achieves the rate epsilon−1logfrac1epsilon, showing that finding stationary points is easier given convexity.




Cited in
(25)








This page was built for publication: Lower bounds for finding stationary points II: first-order methods

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2220663)