Luby-Rackoff ciphers: Why XOR is not so exclusive

DOI10.1007/3-540-36492-7_18MaRDI QIDQ4413868zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Sarvar Patel, Zulfikar Ramzan, Ganapathy S. Sundaram

Publication date 21 July 2003

Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://link.springer.de/link/service/series/0558/bibs/2595/25950271.htm

zbMATH Keywords

Feistel networkLuby-Rackoff ciphersmonosymmetric hash function family

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Data encryption (aspects in computer science) (68P25) Cryptography (94A60)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2009979
• Luby-Rackoff Ciphers from Weak Round Functions?
• The security of Feistel ciphers with six rounds or less
• Towards making Luby-Rackoff ciphers optimal and practical
• Luby-Rackoff revisited: on the use of permutations as inner functions of a Feistel scheme

Cited in

(6)

• Tweakable enciphering schemes using only the encryption function of a block cipher
• On the group generated by the round functions of translation based ciphers over arbitrary finite fields
• Luby-Rackoff Ciphers from Weak Round Functions?
• Quantum-Secure Symmetric-Key Cryptography Based on Hidden Shifts
• Простейшие надгруппы регулярных представлений неабелевых 2-групп с циклической подгруппой индекса 2
• \texttt{Horst} meets \textit{Fluid}-SPN: Griffin for zero-knowledge applications

This page was built for publication: Luby-Rackoff ciphers: Why XOR is not so exclusive

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4413868)