Measurable rectangle

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We give an example of a measurable set of reals E such that the set E'={(x,y): x+y in E} is not in the sigma-algebra generated by the rectangles with measurable sides. We also prove a stronger result that there exists an analytic set E such that E' is not in the sigma-algebra generated by rectangles whose horizontal side is measurable and vertical side is arbitrary. The same results are true when measurable is replaced with property of Baire.


A universal analytic set \(U\subset \mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R}\) is not in the \(\sigma\)-algebra generated by the rectangles of the form \(A\times B\) with \(A\) arbitrary and \(B\) measurable. The same is shown if \(B\) is asked to be of first category. This is an improved result of Mansfield and Rao. The main results concern the set \(E'= \{(x,y)\mid x+y\in E\}\). It is proved that \(E\subset\mathbb{R}\) is Borel if and only if \(E'\) is contained in the \(\sigma\)-algebra generated by the rectangles with measurable sides. An analytic set \(E\subset \mathbb{R}\) exists such that \(E'\) is neither contained in the \(\sigma\)-algebra generated by the rectangles \(A\times B\) with \(A\) arbitrary and \(B\) measurable nor in the \(\sigma\)-algebra generated by \(A\times B\) with \(A\) arbitrary and \(B\) with the Baire property. The proofs use classical results in a tricky way, only the proof of the last result for \(B\) measurable applies a technique of Bartoszynski and Judah and works with notions of determinating reals and random reals.











This page was built for publication: Measurable rectangle

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1322626)