Nonuniqueness of phase retrieval for three fractional Fourier transforms

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We prove that, regardless of the choice of the angles heta1,heta2,heta3, three fractional Fourier transforms Fheta1, Fheta2 and Fheta3 do not solve the phase retrieval problem. That is, there do not exist three angles heta1, heta2, heta3 such that any signal psiinL2(R) could be determined up to a constant phase by knowing only the three intensities |Fheta1psi|2, |Fheta2psi|2 and |Fheta3psi|2. This provides a negative argument against a recent speculation by P. Jaming, who stated that three suitably chosen fractional Fourier transforms are good candidates for phase retrieval in infinite dimension. We recast the question in the language of quantum mechanics, where our result shows that any fixed triple of rotated quadrature observables Qheta1, Qheta2 and Qheta3 is not enough to determine all unknown pure quantum states. The sufficiency of four rotated quadrature observables, or equivalently fractional Fourier transforms, remains an open question.












This page was built for publication: Nonuniqueness of phase retrieval for three fractional Fourier transforms

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2517411)