Note on the Intuitionistic Logic of False Belief
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: In this paper we analyse logic of false belief in intuitionistic setting. This logic, studied in its classical version by Steinsvold, Fan, Gilbert and Venturi, describes the following situation: a formula F is not satisfied in a given world, but we still believe in it (or we think that it should be accepted). Another interpretations are also possible: e.g. that we do not accept F but it is imposed on us by a kind of council or advisory board. From the mathematical point of view, the idea is expressed by an adequate form of modal operator W which is interpreted in relational frames with neighborhoods. We discuss monotonicity of forcing, soundness, completeness and several other issues. We present also some simple systems in which confirmation of previously accepted formula is modelled.
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(8)- Unknown truths and false beliefs: completeness and expressivity results for the neighborhood semantics
- A Grim semantics for logics of belief
- On truth-gaps, bipolar belief and the assertability of vague propositions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6131416 (Why is no real title available?)
- Intuitionistic Logics of Confirmation and Discouragement
- Being wrong: logics for false belief
- A uniform approach to axiomatizing bundled operators
- Logics of false belief and reliable belief
This page was built for publication: Note on the Intuitionistic Logic of False Belief
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6162078)