Notes on separable preferences
Examples are constructed to show that Gorman's important basic theorem for overlapping strictly separable sectors does not hold if the sectors are only nonstrictly separable. This is done with the help of a new definition for the notion of nonstrict separability of utility preferences. The new definition is equivalent to that of Bliss, but it clarifies the relationship between the geometry and representation of preferences with separable sectors. The geometric insight gained leads to the conjecture that if all sectors are strictly essential, then Gorman's basic theorem would hold.
- Conditions for Additive Separability
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3593246 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3395595 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3400635 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3400636 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3092990 (Why is no real title available?)
- Introduction to a Theory of the Internal Structure of Functional Relationships
- On Certain Problems of Aggregation
- Separability vs functional structure: A characterization of their differences
- Separability vs strict separability: A further result
- The Effect of Price Changes on the Demand and Supply of Separable Goods
- The Structure of Utility Functions
- On separability: Functional structure
- min, max, and sum
- Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: traces, dominance, and numerical representations
- Notes on desirability and conditional lower previsions
- Following the traces: an introduction to conjoint measurement without transitivity and additivity
This page was built for publication: Notes on separable preferences
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1073706)