Observational causality testing

DOI10.1002/STA4.70017MaRDI QIDQ6963048zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Brian Knaeble, Braxton Osting, Placede Tshiaba

Publication date 8 July 2025

Published in Stat (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/STA4.70017

zbMATH Keywords

concordanceprognosispropensityrandomnesssensitivity analysis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites work

• A new criterion for confounder selection
• An asymptotic threshold of sufficient randomness for causal inference
• Assignment-Control Plots: A Visual Companion for Causal Inference Study Design
• Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. An introduction
• Generalized Cornfield conditions for the risk difference
• Instrumental variables as bias amplifiers with general outcome and confounding
• Making sense of sensitivity: extending omitted variable bias
• Observational studies.
• On the joint use of propensity and prognostic scores in estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated: a simulation study
• Regression analysis of unmeasured confounding
• Reversals of Least-Square Estimates and Model-Invariant Estimation for Directions of Unique Effects
• Stochastic counterfactuals and stochastic sufficient causes
• The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
• The Probability of Causation under a Stochastic Model for Individual Risk
• The prognostic analogue of the propensity score
• The sensitivity of linear regression coefficients' confidence limits to the omission of a confounder
• Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence

Cited in

(1)

• Multiple regression analysis of unmeasured confounding

This page was built for publication: Observational causality testing

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6963048)