On extensions of local Dirichlet forms

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: Let ce be a Dirichlet form on L2(X,;mu) where (X,mu) is locally compact sigma-compact measure space. Assume ce is inner regular, i.e. regular in restriction to functions of compact support, and local in the sense that ce(varphi,psi)=0 for all varphi,psiinD(ce) with varphi,psi=0. We construct two Dirichlet forms cem and ceM such that cemleqceleqceM. These forms are potentially the smallest and largest such Dirichlet forms. In particular cemsupseteqceM, (ceM)m=cem and (cem)M=ceM. We analyze the family of local, inner regular, Dirichlet forms cf which extend ce and satisfy cemleqcfleqceM. We prove that the latter bounds are valid if and only if cfM=ceM, or cfm=cem, or D(ceM) is an order ideal of D(cf). Alternatively the cf are characterized by D(ceM)capLinfty(X) being an algebraic ideal of D(cf)capLinfty(X). As an application we show that if ce and cf are strongly local then the Ariyoshi--Hino set-theoretic distance is the same for each of the forms ce, ceM and cf. If in addition cem is strongly local then it also defines the same distance. Finally we characterize the uniqueness condition ceM=cem by capacity estimates.


Let \((X,\mu)\) be a locally compact \(\sigma\)-compact measure space and consider a Dirichlet form \(\mathcal E\) on \(L_2(X;\mu)\) which is supposed to be inner regular, that is, regular in restriction to functions of compact support, and local in the sense that \(\mathcal E(\varphi ,\psi)=0\) for all \(\varphi, \psi \in D(\mathcal E)\) such that \(\varphi\psi =0\). The author constructs two Dirichlet forms \(\mathcal E_m\) and \(\mathcal E_M\) with the properties \[ \mathcal E_m\leq \mathcal E\leq \mathcal E_M, \] \(\mathcal E_m\supseteq \mathcal E_M,\) \((\mathcal E_M)_m=\mathcal E_m\) and \((\mathcal E_m)_M=\mathcal E_M\), and analyzes the family of local, inner regular Dirichlet forms \(\mathcal F\) which extend \(\mathcal E\) and satisfy \(\mathcal E_m\leq \mathcal F\leq \mathcal E_M\). It is proved that the latter bounds are valid if and only if \(\mathcal F_M=\mathcal E_M\), or \(\mathcal F_m=\mathcal E_m\), or \(D(\mathcal E_M)\) is an order ideal of \(D(\mathcal F)\). Alternatively, the forms \(\mathcal F\) are characterized by \(D(\mathcal E_M)\cap L_\infty (X)\) being an algebraic ideal of \(D(\mathcal F)\cap L_\infty (X)\). As an application of the obtained results, the author shows that if \(\mathcal E\) and \(\mathcal F\) are strongly local forms, then the Ariyoshi-Hino set-theoretic distance is the same for each of the forms \(\mathcal E\), \(\mathcal E_M\) and \(\mathcal F\). If in addition \(\mathcal E_m\) is strongly local, then it also defines the same distance. Finally, the uniqueness condition \(\mathcal E_M=\mathcal E_m\) is characterized by deriving suitable capacity estimates.



Cites work









This page was built for publication: On extensions of local Dirichlet forms

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q681298)