On structural contraction and why it fails
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A note on contraction-free logic for validity
- An introduction to non-classical logic. From if to is
- Conservatively extending classical logic with transparent truth
- Contraction, infinitary quantifiers, and omega paradoxes
- Contractions of noncontractive consequence relations
- From natural to formal language: a case for logical pluralism
- How a semantics for tonk should be
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1497485 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1907195 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 786485 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3333259 (Why is no real title available?)
- Instability and contraction. \textit{Méditations hégéliennes}. I
- Logical consequence and the paradoxes
- Multiple conclusions
- Naive structure, contraction and paradox
- Non-classical elegance for sequent calculus enthusiasts
- Saving truth from paradox
- Substructural logics: a primer
- Truth without contra(di)ction
- Universal logic
Cited in
(11)- Contraction, infinitary quantifiers, and omega paradoxes
- Naive structure, contraction and paradox
- Noncontractive classical logic
- Instability and contraction. \textit{Méditations hégéliennes}. I
- Restriction by noncontraction
- Contraction and revision
- Contractions of noncontractive consequence relations
- Logical consequence and the paradoxes
- Systems for non-reflexive consequence
- (Meta)inferential levels of entailment beyond the Tarskian paradigm
- Non-contractability and revenge
This page was built for publication: On structural contraction and why it fails
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2693459)