How a semantics for tonk should be
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- What's wrong with tonk(?)
- Connectives stranger than tonk
- On the meaning of connectives (apropos of a non-necessitarianist challenge)
- Knot and tonk: nasty connectives on many-valued truth-tables for classical sentential logic
- Prior's tonk, notions of logic, and levels of inconsistency: vindicating the pluralistic unity of science in the light of categorical logical positivism
Cites work
Cited in
(14)- Anything goes
- Structural weakening and paradoxes
- Introducing identity
- Noncontractive classical logic
- On a distinction of two facets of meaning and its role in proof-theoretic semantics
- On structural contraction and why it fails
- Logical nihilism and the logic of `prem'
- Prior's tonk, notions of logic, and levels of inconsistency: vindicating the pluralistic unity of science in the light of categorical logical positivism
- Non-classical elegance for sequent calculus enthusiasts
- Knot and tonk: nasty connectives on many-valued truth-tables for classical sentential logic
- Knot is not that nasty (but it is hardier than tonk)
- Reading conclusions conjunctively
- Paradoxicality without paradox
- What's wrong with tonk(?)
This page was built for publication: How a semantics for tonk should be
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3195587)