What's wrong with tonk(?)

DOI10.1007/S10992-004-7805-XzbMATH Open1096.03004OpenAlexW2003339379MaRDI QIDQ815017FDOQ815017

Authors: Roy T. Cook 

Publication date: 8 February 2006

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-004-7805-x

Recommendations

• Connectives stranger than tonk
• Anything goes
• How a semantics for tonk should be
• Knot and tonk: nasty connectives on many-valued truth-tables for classical sentential logic
• Prior and Belnap

zbMATH Keywords

inferenceconnectivesdeducibilitytonkparaconsistent

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cites Work

• The logic of paradox
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Analetheism and dialetheism

Cited In (16)

• A family of metainferential logics
• How a semantics for tonk should be
• Weak disharmony: some lessons for proof-theoretic semantics
• Connectives stranger than tonk
• A recovery operator for nontransitive approaches
• Knot is not that nasty (but it is hardier than tonk)
• Logic and natural selection
• Hopeful monsters: a note on multiple conclusions
• Reading conclusions conjunctively
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Suszko's thesis, inferential many-valuedness, and the notion of a logical system
• Disjoint logics
• Knot and tonk: nasty connectives on many-valued truth-tables for classical sentential logic
• Anything goes
• Prior's tonk, notions of logic, and levels of inconsistency: vindicating the pluralistic unity of science in the light of categorical logical positivism
• Blurring: an approach to conflation

Uses Software

• PLINK

This page was built for publication: What's wrong with tonk(?)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q815017)