Blurring: an approach to conflation

DOI10.1215/00294527-2017-0025zbMath1455.03037OpenAlexW2784382056MaRDI QIDQ1750295

David Ripley

Publication date: 18 May 2018

Published in: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/1be93ab2250200bb944e0bde0f9d9cc7baef8ffd

zbMATH Keywords

blurringconflationconfusiontetravaluations

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Other nonclassical logic (03B60) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (5)

Two traditions in abstract valuational model theory ⋮ Vagueness is a kind of conflation ⋮ Valuations: bi, tri, and tetra ⋮ Identity in Mares-Goldblatt models for quantified relevant logic ⋮ Confused terms in ordinary language

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• The categorical and the hypothetical: a critique of some fundamental assumptions of standard semantics
• Tolerant, classical, strict
• What's wrong with tonk(?)
• Residuated lattices. An algebraic glimpse at substructural logics
• Too much reference: Semantics for multiply signifying terms
• A model of tolerance
• Partial inductive definitions
• Anything goes
• A robust non-transitive logic
• ‘Transitivity’ of Consequence Relations

This page was built for publication: Blurring: an approach to conflation