On subspace-diskcyclicity

Abstract: In this paper, we define and study subspace-diskcyclic operators. We show that subspace-diskcyclicity does not imply to diskcyclicity. We establish a subspace-diskcyclic criterion and use it to find a subspace-diskcyclic operator that is not subspace-hypercyclic for any subspaces. Also, we show that the inverse of invertible subspace-diskcyclic operators do not need to be subspace-diskcyclic for any subspaces. Finally, we prove that every finite-dimensional separable Hilbert space over the complex field supports a subspace-diskcyclic operator.

Review text

Let \(\mathbb{D}\) denote the closed unit disk in the complex plane \(\mathbb{C}\). Given an operator \(T\) on a Banach space \(X\) and a vector \(x \in X\), the disk orbit of \(x\) under \(T\) is defined by \[ \mathbb{D}\operatorname{Orb}(T,x) = \{\lambda T^n x : \lambda\, \in \mathbb{D} \text{ and } n \geq 0\}. \] The operator \(T\) is said to be diskcyclic if \(\mathbb{D}\operatorname{Orb}(T,x)\) is dense in \(X\) for some \(x \in X\). The authors introduce the notion of a subspace-diskcyclic operator. The operator \(T\) is said to be subspace-diskcyclic for \(M\) (or \(M\)-diskcyclic), where \(M\) is a nontrivial closed subspace of \(X\), if there is a vector \(x \in X\) such that \(\mathbb{D}\operatorname{Orb}(T,x) \cap M\) is dense in \(M\). They establish a subspace-diskcyclicity criterion and prove that every finite-dimensional complex Banach space supports a subspace-diskcyclic operator. Moreover, they give examples showing that the inverse of an invertible subspace-diskcyclic operator need not be subspace-diskcyclic and that subspace-diskcyclicity does neither imply diskcyclicity nor subspace-hypercyclicity.

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(7)

This page was built for publication: On subspace-diskcyclicity

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2359816)