On the Difference Between the Classical and Inverse Methods of Calibration

DOI10.2307/2347761MaRDI QIDQ3489193zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Shein-Chung Chow, Jun Shao

Publication date 1990

Published in Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.2307/2347761

zbMATH Keywords

classical estimatorinverse estimatorlinear calibrationrelative ratio

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Point estimation (62F10) Linear inference, regression (62J99)

Recommendations

• A Comparison of Classical and Inverse Estimators in the Calibration Problem
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1366901
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1183927
• New perspectives on linear calibration
• The calibration problem as an ill-posed inverse problem

Cited in

(7)

• Analyzing Residuals in Calibration Problems
• A Comparison of Classical and Inverse Estimators in the Calibration Problem
• Applied regression analysis bibliography update 1990-91
• On model selection for standard curve in assay development
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1366901 (Why is no real title available?)
• A non-Bayesian predictive approach for statistical calibration
• Standard error of inverse prediction for dose-response relationship: approximate and exact statistical inference

This page was built for publication: On the Difference Between the Classical and Inverse Methods of Calibration

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3489193)